Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5043 14
Original file (NR5043 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
eer ress

t ro SCE wea rt

RA RAD FOR CORRECTION OE NAWAL WET ORE Bm rn
sc E ROAD, SUITE 100%

NGTON, VA 22204-2490 yy,

Docket No: 5043-14
6 January 2015

 

 

dear (Sy

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of titie 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552. The application was filed in a timely
manner.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 3 December 2014. . The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your
allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance —
with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with ail
material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and
applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.

after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

Your record reflects that on 12 January 2006, your commanding
officer submitted a request for waiver for your retention in the
Navy. This waiver outlined your outpatient Level I treatment,
alcohol abuse disciplinary action, and completion of the program.
On 7 March 2006, the discharge authority advised your commanding
officer that the waiver had been approved and that you were to he
retained. At that time you were also warned that any further
alcohol abuse incidents would result in administrative

separation.

The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially Mitigating factors, such as
your request for removal of the “January and March 2006 request
for waiver” documentation from your naval record. Nevertheless,
the Board noted this documentation was valid as written and
filed, because your request is based on a change of policy dated
4 dune 2009, Wilh Chal being seid, the Boera coluiudeda tere was
no error or injustice in your record and as such, the request for
waiver should remain in the record. Accordingly, your
application has been denied.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
Favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence within one year from the date of the Board's decision.
Mew evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board
prior to making its decision in your case. In this regard, it is
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity
attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying
for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on
the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

Sincerely,

 

ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09377-08

    Original file (09377-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 August 2009. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 13161-09

    Original file (13161-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. It appears that you were subsequently notified of administrative separation action by reason of fraudulent enlistment due to your failure to disclose your pre-service drug and alcohol abuse involvement. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00546-10

    Original file (00546-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 September 2010. However, the SARP at Corpus Christi Hospital and your command Drug and Alcohol Program Assistant (DAPA) Ggtermined that you were an alcohol rehabilitation failure and it was recommended that you be separated for not complying with the Peonmended treatment. On 27 February 2008, your case was heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB), which...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07800-05

    Original file (07800-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your Naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 28 September 1982 at age 19. You were...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11006-10

    Original file (11006-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ail material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, about a month later, on 11 April 2006, you self- referred for participation in a drug and alcohol rehabilitation program due to alcohol abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04627-06

    Original file (04627-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 8 August 1961 at age 17. On 3 June 1963, you were committed to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02435-06

    Original file (02435-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 29 July 1977 at age 20. On 24October 1979 you were convicted by...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01891-08

    Original file (01891-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Regulations direct the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to members who are discharged due to alcohol rehabilitation failure. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02458-08

    Original file (02458-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You were assigned a reentry code of RE-4, On 3 November 1993 the Bureau of Naval Personnel informed your command that you did not qualify for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1901-13

    Original file (NR1901-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 January 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...